!
fright in flies It is natural to solve your problem first for a suitable instrument, ie a specific solution algorithm, a method to keep lookout. Need to be committed to finding solutions fundamentally new ways, this is indicated in the previous chapters only possible where the problem is represented in many different ways.
A mind map could be such a representation tool. Do not! Concept maps, word clouds, network diagrams, rich pictures, 2D or 3D drawings, mathematical formulas or simple articles such as this expand the bandwidth of the possibilities. And there dererlei possibilities are many, as you can see about this website in under [HYPERLINK] .
By and large, is thus trying to accomplish with the tools of observation to a change of perspective in thinking with the aim to isolate the problem or model. The psychology would include the removal of a functional or understand at a fixation.
we doing for a moment like that, as we were a common house fly. On the solution for the new problem, we know little to nothing. Thus there is spiritual twilight. The "only" what we know, our past life experiences and thought patterns -In a figurative sense, a light bulb. So we will fly again and again, we burn the nose, and do not solve the problem. Our thinking is always in the direction of light bulb, as long as nothing else happens.
I am sure that the fly as often pushes against the hot light bulb until the sensor is suffering occurs and restricts consciousness or a panic reaction.
When panic, however, the action is no longer determined by the original problem in search of food, but by the problem of the impending consequences, just death, replaced.
And that has implications for panic Solution: Fixing the light is repealed and the fly escapes due to other (Panic), pattern of movement from the open window.
cause the hot light bulb, a loss of eyesight is suffering, so the sensors, the fixation is also removed and the fly disappears also from the open window. Though with little hope of a permanent survival.
.. panic and Sensors!
What we can for the constructive approach to solving problems in any use case is to come in a coercive predicament. It may there be no panic reaction, nor should the necessary sensors (sensitivity) suffer. Both have but in the case of the fly "helped" because elected by the substitution problem in a different way was or the limitation of the sensors (senses) a completely different approach had to be chosen. So, the problem replacement or limitation of the sensors by the procedure or the procedure to be adopted.
By opting for a mind map or any other means are always connected restrictions that affect the degree of approximation to the real problem. The choice of the method is deceptive thus before the loss of sensor sensitivity and / or help us familiar paths and ways of thinking to leave.
The real problem was represented by the application of a specific procedure in another form.
.. Theses 01: The replacement problem
your .. must have chaos within you to give birth to a dancing star (Nietzsche)
What do you think: how much understanding of how much conditions in a mind map in the branches-in other words only in the drawn lines are hidden? I maintain that the lines actually compressed text are! For example, we decompose an object into its properties and draw lines in retrospect. Maybe something roughly formulated, but we write on two nouns, and "hide" the verbs, the assumed (correct or incorrect) statement on the relationship by a twig or branch.
Located in the branches not the creative potential, the "dark matter" of a mind map? A task, represented by two titles and a drawn road, so to speak, as a placeholder for the notes to the relationship. This process reminds me of an article in creaffective Blog of lateral thinking. Lateral thinking comes to fore here, as you suspected your relationship at some point and must somehow be explained by lateral thinking.
.. Zergliederungsmethoden 1st Procedure: Is it atomizing
but other possibilities such as the above approach for dissecting of issues (mind maps)? Simple procedures for analysis of issues I have summarized below and as "the first Zegliederungsmethoden Regulation".
These include the:
All these methods have in common is that issues are dissected without further restrictions. But is there also a higher quality Zergliederungsmethoden? Zergliederungsmethoden having more rules than a mere "atomizing"! Such a method I have tried to develop and present them like below.
Previously, I would like to introduce the concept of "Zergliederungshilfen. As a "Zergliederungshilfen" I call those approaches that help the decomposition of topics can be carried out methodically
.. Zergliederungshilfen: Wh-questions
The five W questions are the questions for a journalist, to make their response to the start of any good message in a newspaper or the news and also form the basis of any research activity. The "W" questions are so called because they are made with the W-words.
thing I would still want to go to the bottom, and add a sixth question: Why it happened
?
.. Zergliederungshilfen: Phases
use within my projects I standard stages to play through various scenarios with the aim of further knowledge dissipate over the course of the project. These phases combined with the W-questions arise quite a lot of sub-themes with which to deal.
. . Zergliederungshilfen More
From my perspective, there are still a number of additional Zergliederungshilfen I would like to introduce for reasons of clarity elsewhere.
.. Zergliederungsmethoden the 2nd Procedure: systemic analysis
The essence of this approach is that the analysis be carried out while maintaining the overall relationship and maintaining all manifestations of the problem was.
The procedure is as follows:
.. example:
It is short, a business lunch by the method of analysis first O. prepare:
[first analysis Procedure: W-questions / Who will all attend / where to take place the food / What is to be offered to eat / What will take place the business lunch / How shall we come to the place / will take place when the food / etc]
is it short term, a business lunch by the method of dissection second O. prepare:
[second analysis Order:
From the simple statement that business partners want to eat each other, following the dismemberment of the 2nd Order "systematic" staked out a framework timetable. After the announcement of the appointment, each individual could adjust.
When Zergliederungsmethode 1st Regulation has also announced a date. Everyone could also be prepared. But has for all the existing time passed? Although this was clearly where the food takes place, but the transformation of the "where" was the view of the business partner is not carried out.
.. Summary: Mind Map rules
There, the terms "Zergliederungsmethode" and "Zergliederungshilfen" are introduced. In Zergliederungsmethode is the way to be dissected as intended. A distinction is made in:
Zergliederungsmethoden after the 1st Rules vary as follows:
.. general rules
An overview of the key findings from all chapters:
framework problems:
rules for Mind Map's
first Distinguishing different Zergliederungsmethoden
1.1 Zergliederungsmethoden first Procedure (atomizing)
1.2 Zergliederungsmethoden second Procedure (systemic analysis)
second Benefits of different Zergliederungshilfen
A mind map could be such a representation tool. Do not! Concept maps, word clouds, network diagrams, rich pictures, 2D or 3D drawings, mathematical formulas or simple articles such as this expand the bandwidth of the possibilities. And there dererlei possibilities are many, as you can see about this website in under [HYPERLINK] .
By and large, is thus trying to accomplish with the tools of observation to a change of perspective in thinking with the aim to isolate the problem or model. The psychology would include the removal of a functional or understand at a fixation.
we doing for a moment like that, as we were a common house fly. On the solution for the new problem, we know little to nothing. Thus there is spiritual twilight. The "only" what we know, our past life experiences and thought patterns -In a figurative sense, a light bulb. So we will fly again and again, we burn the nose, and do not solve the problem. Our thinking is always in the direction of light bulb, as long as nothing else happens.
I am sure that the fly as often pushes against the hot light bulb until the sensor is suffering occurs and restricts consciousness or a panic reaction.
When panic, however, the action is no longer determined by the original problem in search of food, but by the problem of the impending consequences, just death, replaced.
And that has implications for panic Solution: Fixing the light is repealed and the fly escapes due to other (Panic), pattern of movement from the open window.
cause the hot light bulb, a loss of eyesight is suffering, so the sensors, the fixation is also removed and the fly disappears also from the open window. Though with little hope of a permanent survival.
.. panic and Sensors!
What we can for the constructive approach to solving problems in any use case is to come in a coercive predicament. It may there be no panic reaction, nor should the necessary sensors (sensitivity) suffer. Both have but in the case of the fly "helped" because elected by the substitution problem in a different way was or the limitation of the sensors (senses) a completely different approach had to be chosen. So, the problem replacement or limitation of the sensors by the procedure or the procedure to be adopted.
By opting for a mind map or any other means are always connected restrictions that affect the degree of approximation to the real problem. The choice of the method is deceptive thus before the loss of sensor sensitivity and / or help us familiar paths and ways of thinking to leave.
The real problem was represented by the application of a specific procedure in another form.
.. Theses 01: The replacement problem
- The loss of the sensor is connected with the choice of solution method and a Mind Map. It changes the awareness and thus the perception of a problem.
- The panic reaction is due to the threat consequences are greater explanation of the branches or neutralized by other ideas.
your .. must have chaos within you to give birth to a dancing star (Nietzsche)
What do you think: how much understanding of how much conditions in a mind map in the branches-in other words only in the drawn lines are hidden? I maintain that the lines actually compressed text are! For example, we decompose an object into its properties and draw lines in retrospect. Maybe something roughly formulated, but we write on two nouns, and "hide" the verbs, the assumed (correct or incorrect) statement on the relationship by a twig or branch.
Located in the branches not the creative potential, the "dark matter" of a mind map? A task, represented by two titles and a drawn road, so to speak, as a placeholder for the notes to the relationship. This process reminds me of an article in creaffective Blog of lateral thinking. Lateral thinking comes to fore here, as you suspected your relationship at some point and must somehow be explained by lateral thinking.
.. Zergliederungsmethoden 1st Procedure: Is it atomizing
but other possibilities such as the above approach for dissecting of issues (mind maps)? Simple procedures for analysis of issues I have summarized below and as "the first Zegliederungsmethoden Regulation".
These include the:
- approaches to analysis of issues in sub-themes, which are carried out on a secure knowledge and background. The relationship, which is the branch or branch between two nodes is a generally recognized and knowingly right relationship and can later be explained verbally, pictorially or quoted without much effort.
- approach to mind mapping by analysis of issues in sub-topics from an insecure knowledge and background and basis of conjecture. These relationships may prove to be correct or incorrect and, later confirmed by cross-or reverse thinking in retrospect (... or not).
- procedures for the creation of Mind Maps, by instinctive, emotional "dismemberment" of the issue in terms of clustering. Very quickly noted key points or associations to the "gravitational field" to "escape" the beaten paths of thought.
All these methods have in common is that issues are dissected without further restrictions. But is there also a higher quality Zergliederungsmethoden? Zergliederungsmethoden having more rules than a mere "atomizing"! Such a method I have tried to develop and present them like below.
Previously, I would like to introduce the concept of "Zergliederungshilfen. As a "Zergliederungshilfen" I call those approaches that help the decomposition of topics can be carried out methodically
.. Zergliederungshilfen: Wh-questions
The five W questions are the questions for a journalist, to make their response to the start of any good message in a newspaper or the news and also form the basis of any research activity. The "W" questions are so called because they are made with the W-words.
- What happened?
- Who is involved?
- happened Where is it? When it happened
- ?
- What happened?
thing I would still want to go to the bottom, and add a sixth question: Why it happened
?
.. Zergliederungshilfen: Phases
use within my projects I standard stages to play through various scenarios with the aim of further knowledge dissipate over the course of the project. These phases combined with the W-questions arise quite a lot of sub-themes with which to deal.
- delivery of raw materials (size, weight, supply, storage space, delivery time)
- emergency care during the creation
- Creation (machinery and equipment for creation)
- Technical inspections (audits)
- initial or re-opening (special cases, initializations)
- operation (normal case)
- parallel, peripheral Bert drive (Duch user needs)
- down time (spare / replacement)
- end of operation
- disposal
. . Zergliederungshilfen More
From my perspective, there are still a number of additional Zergliederungshilfen I would like to introduce for reasons of clarity elsewhere.
.. Zergliederungsmethoden the 2nd Procedure: systemic analysis
The essence of this approach is that the analysis be carried out while maintaining the overall relationship and maintaining all manifestations of the problem was.
The procedure is as follows:
- naming the objects, themes, elements, presumably on the problem and its specific manifestations, Properties might be involved.
- Parent dissection (Zergliederungshilfen!) of these objects and elements in the conservation of all forms of the overall problem. It will discuss the impact on the rest of elements and highlighting the relevance to the problem of interaction between adjacent subsystems.
- set of subsystems as needed. The determination can be made, for example, a grouping of sub-systems depending on a particular state change.
.. example:
It is short, a business lunch by the method of analysis first O. prepare:
[first analysis Procedure: W-questions / Who will all attend / where to take place the food / What is to be offered to eat / What will take place the business lunch / How shall we come to the place / will take place when the food / etc]
is it short term, a business lunch by the method of dissection second O. prepare:
[second analysis Order:
- business partners - Food / / Who, How much?
- number of participants - the number of eating / / Where?
- number of participants - number of meals eaten and where / / transmission of "where" left on the site!
- How many of the participants who where are - need as much food out / / Association: transportation problem!
- is how and where each of the participants to the x place and how long to wait, the first / / Association: transport = time => When should be eaten?
- announcement of the appointment]
From the simple statement that business partners want to eat each other, following the dismemberment of the 2nd Order "systematic" staked out a framework timetable. After the announcement of the appointment, each individual could adjust.
When Zergliederungsmethode 1st Regulation has also announced a date. Everyone could also be prepared. But has for all the existing time passed? Although this was clearly where the food takes place, but the transformation of the "where" was the view of the business partner is not carried out.
.. Summary: Mind Map rules
There, the terms "Zergliederungsmethode" and "Zergliederungshilfen" are introduced. In Zergliederungsmethode is the way to be dissected as intended. A distinction is made in:
- a free analysis without regard to interaction or interaction of the (sub) topics among themselves,
- or in the systematic analysis by transferring to other Zergliederungskriterien Topics. It is with regard to interaction and interaction.
Zergliederungsmethoden after the 1st Rules vary as follows:
- mind mapping through the articulation of issues in the sub-themes from a secure knowledge and background. The relationship, obscured by a painted road is a real relationship and can be explained in later language, visual, or others.
- The creation of Mind Maps by Analysis of issues in sub-topics from an insecure knowledge and background and basis of conjecture. These relationships may prove later to be right or wrong. These relationships are confirmed by cross-or reverse thinking in retrospect (... or not).
- procedures for creating mind maps of instinctive, emotional "dismemberment" of the issue in terms of clustering. Very quickly noted key points or associations to the "gravitational field" to "escape" the beaten paths of thought.
.. general rules
An overview of the key findings from all chapters:
framework problems:
- Differentiate based on your knowledge, whether a task should be handled, or whether you approach a problem! [Section 01]
- If you tackle a problem, ask for so long after the "Why?" or "Why?" until you have defined it! [Cap: 02]
- Report the problem in mind the problems and finding solutions! [Section 01]
- Accept as part of the problem without prejudice, to gain experience! [Section 01]
- Take your expertise with home and model the problem! [Section 01]
- Find the right lever and then you solve your problem! [Section 01]
rules for Mind Map's
first Distinguishing different Zergliederungsmethoden
1.1 Zergliederungsmethoden first Procedure (atomizing)
1.2 Zergliederungsmethoden second Procedure (systemic analysis)
second Benefits of different Zergliederungshilfen
