Highlights
- problems need to be defined!
- Reality is not understandable!
- Attention mental blocks, objectivity, ideals, role models etc.
Chapter 02: Jim Button and Luke the Engine Driver
lonely desert area between the "end of the world" and the "Land of a Thousand Volcanoes'. The rocks here are so incredibly black that all light, heat is swallowed.
is to pass through this region on a dead straight road on a narrow ridge between two abysses, which leads to the highest point through the "mouth of death" - a rock arch, by the constantly blowing an icy wind and this causes terrible noise.
Emma's first steam to ice in the freezing cold to snow could the road in the absolute darkness visible.
"The fruit grows on the edge of the tree" in Chapter 01 of I dealt with the general way of dealing with problems, but it still assumes that you, the problem was already known or has been brought to you in any way. Your knowledge and your knowledge have made it either a problem or a task. However, as is the reality? The problem must first not only recognized or understood, or the problems are made visible or deferred? To the visualization and delineation of problems for me to feel below.
analogy
try but even a to describe the unknown object in total darkness! The only tool is a laser pointer, which allows you to illuminate the object. This laser pointer has a certain color spectrum (your cultural background), a defined light energy (your intellect) and a circular cone of light it shines in a confined space (your scope of knowledge) from.
close as observers at first glance that this object glows red, a small structure and circular. Other observers with other laser pointers (ie, with other color spectra, higher or not as high energy light beam and larger) feature that this object may claim greenish shines, has a fine grain structure, also round, but is larger.
The need of the observer to compare the collected impressions, leads to a varied presentation and a more comprehensive picture of the unknown object. Different views and observations are replaced by language and script and compared. After that objective knowledge Islands and uniform description languages are developed to describe the unknown object as well as the laser pointer better.
After some time, there is just passing multiple observers with laser pointers, the so-called objective (uniform) color spectra. Several observers, supported by the spectacle objectivity and knowledge but only collect similar findings. This unification of views and knowledge, and belief in the objectivity, however, displace, in my view, the language requirement, which previously was for the exchange of information so important. In the shadow of the accumulated evidence, a different light of understanding comes when you no longer.
But: Our heads are round so that thoughts can change direction!
stock but the task is not an unknown object described? They noted that nothing was known about you, so you knew nothing about it, suggesting but after all, the fact that this acted more of a problem than a problem! They were therefore approached with your knowledge and methods to solve the problem and came from hundertetsten the thousandth, but still made it not because you are still remembered one criterion or another position was added.
Did you perhaps not at first easy to ask why they should describe the object at all or do?
The answer might have been: "We want to build an airport and have to fly over this property so we want to know what it is.". Or: "We want to build an open-air cinema and want to know whether the surface of the object itself To watch a movie is "
you access to his head and cry." Of course! The problem is always the problem in the head. "You should have found the image with your laser pointer, only the contour of the unknown object so that the aircraft safely past it, or can fly over it. Think about the color and texture was to make the object completely . not necessary This is where the importance of problem definition, because the reality can not be detected, but the problem very simply by containment by using one or more "Why?" -.. or? Why "questions If you can The next time an apparent problem is described, ask the "why".
allegations
- objectivity is a drug that leads to the dependence of the DC circuit. Meanwhile, one should always be aware.
- knowledge must be present at a level that is necessary to solve the problem. In addition, it is more ballast and üngünstigenfalls a sign in the wrong direction.
- between reality and reality is distinguished. The reality is within us and causes our actions. The reality is the full extent intangible.
- Do you feel that you have to solve again and again and still lacks a detailed, tear around the wheel, because you lose are just in the immensity of reality, or to your need for objectivity.
An enhanced recipe for problems
Only tasks can be solved without the "why" to ask. In case of problems is not. My
rules widens over Chapter 01 at the point of demarcation issue by simply saying "Why":
- Differentiate based on your knowledge, whether a task should be handled, or whether you approach a problem! [Section 01]
- If you tackle a problem, ask for so long after the "Why?" or "Why?" until you have defined it! [Cap: 02]
- Report the problem in mind the problems and finding solutions! [Section 01]
- Accept as part of the problem without prejudice, to gain experience! [Section 01]
- Take your expertise with home and model the problem! [Section 01]
- Find the right lever and then you solve your problem! [Section 01]
0 comments:
Post a Comment