mentioned perspectives in mind mapping As in post 16, got A spatial interpretation of Mind Maps is insufficient. But can I find their appeal and have spatial images depending on the quality of the cameraman the same scene are captured in different ways. Whether
is now used a frog perspective, a central perspective or bird's eye view is undoubtedly linked to the theme of the film and the current scene. I would use for children's films such as the frog's perspective: Everything is seen more from the bottom and appears to be infinitely large, a total lack of overview and everything is made up of details is somehow flat. For the duelists in a Western seems to me the central perspective suitable. The flight lines of the facades and the road show formally on the opponent and highlight the confrontation. For hunting or the appearance of a surveillance state bird prospects are interesting to demonstrate the superiority of the pursuer.
Why should it not be possible to apply this experience to the description of problems. Is what it is to me and so I have first determined times, which means 3d for me is
Nothing, it seems
3-Dimensional means to me the subjective interpretation of a spatial arrangement of objects. What I mean is that the objects in reality are not arranged as they appear to us as a mental picture. Klssisches example, the road edges of an elongated road that seem to touch on the horizon. But this is not the case. Go out to the horizon, and look after. The road is still the same width.
relocation
One speculation could be now that this may be related to our two eyes, but try it a try, contact an eye out. The effect of the vanishing point and the vanishing rays (roadside) is still present.
At least one side of the road disappears only when the observer's point would be part of the roadside and the same, therefore, expands in sight. Change only a bit their position or the object's size, you get an escape jet.
Since our topic on Mind Map's, and more in ways of thinking, refers to me I can resist at this point not to mention, is regarded as important, too, a relocation or change of perspective for the assessment of a problem.
point of exchange
But the position and the direction of their mind's eye (perception) the problem is something special. Only through the ingestion of different points in the 3-dimensional space, such as when viewing a cube, either a cube, square or rectangle observed with the center line. Footing, everyone is right with his statement, as you can see in the picture.
You the position is not changed, the only, but a very weighty
accusation that one can make them however. In any case, a will changing his standpoint there is enough discussion of the problem is required.
Overlapping Mind Maps
Different people have depending on the educational, professional character and cultural background on a subject more or less different positions.
It is clearly not that you created mind maps more or less from each other, different aspects as well as also exhibit common features such as the following shows:
The union of the three positions (Mind Maps) within the same mind map gives the following picture. This mixes tend lens (common knowledge that everyone accepts) still subjective things. This is also the starting point for a further definition 1 -, 2 -, 3 - or n-dimensional mind maps:
A map is then 1 -, 2 -, 3 - or n-dimensional, if or n arrows show respect - at least 1 node 1 -, 2 -, 3. Similar to a list, table or matrix in which a node under different categories (1 to n) can be classified. Location or point of change are thus mandatory for the generation of a 3D mind map is required.
Since s now a node in more than one category can be classified distinguishes the usual mind map (1-dimensional) to the n-dimensional map. The different positions on one and the same subject are possible seems to me even more realistic.
I suggest an n-dim. Map the purposes of this post as Mind (s) map to identify !
Summary
In essence, I am of the opinion that should the classification of a mind map in 2d or 3d only to the manner and style of presentation.
With regard to the term "information dimension" a map, aside from the above classification also be multidimensional. This dimensionality is caused by considering different views or perceptions within the same map.
A node can thus be classified under different categories. Depending on the maximum number of parent categories, the map is then "up to n-dimensional". However, I think the term Mind (s) map sufficient because the number of positions the dimensionality of the observed scene not increased.
To illustrate a few examples shown
- A mind map on the screen or paper as I would now 2d Mindmap call
- A mind map display the spatial impression Depth is mediated therefore 3d mind map A mind map
- as in 1 but with 2 or more points on the same topic I would call 2d-Mind (s) map .
- A mind map as in 2 but with 2 or more points on the same topic I would call 3d Mind (s) map .
greeting Chiochip
In view of the spatial dimensions of my 2D maps as I do not use the talking kann.Ich depth of information but also more dimensions, so can I grab at you through an additional layer of information in the map. Here are Mind Maps multidimensional general, since I work for example with colors, symbols, and spatial localization, purely pack more info.