pulse
But, but! What's here for 3-dimensional maps. Frankly, one of you ever seen a 2 dimensional? The nodes are connected but always good with lines. Although a lot of lines, but still lines. And thus a real dimensional. OK! Weil's just so many are 1.2 or 1.3 dimensional. But 2 dimensional? Neeh! This is only the paper on the record, we use the map. Or?
The lunch break will not be long and therefore I have the following interpretation of a 3D mind map as it is in the comments between Florence and I were in post 16 simply here her copies:
question-answer game or ideas B log:
Hi Stefan! I've also Kürzl I talk to people about 3D mind maps and the question of whether and where it is the added value. What do you think this is? One aspect I see is that this paper na course, get more info on a map, because you kann.Ein joint use and the depth of other could be that one example of the depth to assign a specific meaning, eg them enrelevante branches.
Hello Florian! So ic h A am uffassung that you get with 3d maps, no more information on the map. You get it only served in 3d and wins a deep impression, which functions in the retrieval of key information may additionally be helpful (mnemonics).
The depth dimension assigns a specific meaning n is only a possibility. For example, a timeline! Means that arise Mindmapknoten, depending on the scenario time "event horizon" and the "haze" is not recognizable.
question: Why is your Map 2 Dimensional? Just because you it on "paper" paint?
-
Hi Florian!
Very good! It seems to me we are on the same path.
I think "information dimension" the right word.
But your last sentence is not clear to me! Do you understand attributes to the information layer in the sense of "mark highlighters, = Info cockpit? Would this be a new dimension? - No!
The content of the map will only but hierarchich with nodes and branches represented. Everything else (color, symbols, etc.) addition. Here I am looking for the dimension!
The node is geometrically 0-dimensional, the branch is 1-dimensional.
The branch represents an unspecified substance relationship based on a hierarchical subordination. The node is the theme is to understand as a keyword, but no explanation (full explanation).
question: What now in terms of your word creation (information dimension) higher node or branch?
I maintain the knot! The node is actually superior to exist because of his "pioneering" relations with the sub-categories. What do you mean?
So if the node would be superior, not non 0d and 1d, as this is already the branch, then they are 2d. -So a surface. Then I say just now that the main theme 0d (the real point).
But what is now 3d?
3d in the clarity, the connection of land that is 2d (the old node)! Cross-references between the surfaces (old node) thus create 3d Mind Maps!
Where am I now landed -?)
This was above 3d-vision of the mind map created from a one-way Konzeptmap.
is basically a 3d mindmap thus a new combination of nodes from different main categories within an existing mind map with the following dimensions of information:
- 0d: main theme, main idea
- 1d branch, hierarchical reference
- 2d nodes, category
- 3d: cross-references between the nodes
Greetings Stefan
In view of the spatial dimensions of my 2D maps as I do not use the talking kann.Ich depth of information but also more dimensions, so can I grab at you through an additional layer of information in the map. Here are Mind Maps multidimensional general, since I work for example with colors, symbols, and spatial localization, purely pack more info.