creativity The following postal treated my definition of creativity.
I was motivated by an article on the creaffective Blog this and have spoken to do so.
My definition is:
If the product of a need "today," the needs of "tomorrow" was satisfied that this person creative.
where: mean
- in need a real (physical) condition and lack
- with an emotional need meant (spiritual) deficiency.
Why do so and not otherwise:
I believe the subject is critical in whether someone is creative or not.
imagine that, intentionally or not, the resources for a group of people will be minimized specifically to promote the development of new ideas under certain conditions!
As the mother of invention makes emergency, then to be expected after a certain time solutions to the problem. These solutions could then also be called creative solutions.
I think these are against it and say that this is just good, or maybe less good solutions are on an implicit task. In such situations there can be no individual creativity, but only results, otherwise the group has to face the consequences. In this case, the system was rather creative in its entirety: The application site has changed the environment so cleverly that the group solutions (also sent) has produced.
Developed from a need, however someone out a new product that is also useful, he may designate itself as a creative. For he has, at least in his view created something completely new. Whether it is the product of a creative product ultimately be decided by the society, be confidently a wider horizon of knowledge can assume.
I have read, for example, that creativity will be the ability of intelligent beings to find new and creative solutions to problems.
I see not so, for here was the problem of plate already at work and some creative. This product is therefore a result of the problem disc and problem solver.
0 comments:
Post a Comment